New top story on Hacker News: Show HN: Exp. Smoothing is 32% more accurate and 100x faster than Neural-Prophet
Show HN: Exp. Smoothing is 32% more accurate and 100x faster than Neural-Prophet
110 by maxmc | 23 comments We benchmarked on more than 55K series and show that ETS improves MAPE and sMAPE forecast accuracy by 32% and 19%, respectively, with 104x less computational time over NeuralProphet. We hope this exercise helps the forecast community avoid adopting yet another overpromising and unproven forecasting method. on Hacker News.
We benchmarked on more than 55K series and show that ETS improves MAPE and sMAPE forecast accuracy by 32% and 19%, respectively, with 104x less computational time over NeuralProphet. We hope this exercise helps the forecast community avoid adopting yet another overpromising and unproven forecasting method.
110 by maxmc | 23 comments We benchmarked on more than 55K series and show that ETS improves MAPE and sMAPE forecast accuracy by 32% and 19%, respectively, with 104x less computational time over NeuralProphet. We hope this exercise helps the forecast community avoid adopting yet another overpromising and unproven forecasting method. on Hacker News.
We benchmarked on more than 55K series and show that ETS improves MAPE and sMAPE forecast accuracy by 32% and 19%, respectively, with 104x less computational time over NeuralProphet. We hope this exercise helps the forecast community avoid adopting yet another overpromising and unproven forecasting method.
Comments
Post a Comment